How often and to what extent have we observed versatility in authors? If there was a scale from 0 to 10 to measure versatility, I'd give Ashwin Sanghi, the author of the 2016-released Sialkot Saga, an 11. If you’ve read the book then you’d know why. A decade ago, we read The Rozabal Line, the fiction-thriller that had us imagine Jesus Christ settling down in India after surviving his crucifixion. He then went on to write Chanakya's Chant and The Krishna Key that have a narrative style similar to Dan Brown’s Da Vinci Code and The Lost Symbol, hailing him ‘India's Dan Brown’. He even co-authored a couple of books in James Patterson’s Private series. The fiction-thriller genre has been Sanghi’s preferred choice for the past eleven years. But then last year, we saw a different side of Ashwin Sanghi — a life hack guru.
Now how does someone go from writing fiction to writing self-help books? I mean, they aren’t even remotely similar! I had a lot of questions for Ashwin Sanghi and lucky for me, he was patient enough to sit down and answer all of them prior to the release of the third book in his 13 Steps series, 13 Steps to Bloody Good Marks.
Excerpts:
Honestly, one wouldn't imagine the author of Chanakya's Chant to write a self-help book. How did the 13 Steps series come up?
It's not a transition. The 13 Steps series came up as a coincidence. I was in Chennai for a literary conference when someone came up to me and said, "You've spoken about the importance of good luck — that you'd never have made it as an author had it not been for good luck." My publisher was standing next to me and he began laughing and said, "Ashwin, this calls for a book where you explain what good luck really is." That is what resulted in 13 Steps to Bloody Good Luck. We realised that people were actually reading and appreciating it. We could think of many other ideas and then eventually we came up with 13 Steps to Bloody Good Wealth and 13 Steps to Bloody Good Marks.
We know that Dan Brown spends years researching a single book. How much time does India's Dan Brown spend on research?
(Laughs) It varies from book to book. Currently, I have three separate series that I’m working on — the Bharat series, the Private series, and the 13 Steps series. In the Bharat series, I read around 18 to 24 books to research for one book. It might be about six months for the Private series and less than six months for the 13 Steps series.
The above excerpts are from 13 Steps to Bloody Good Marks by Ashwin Sanghi, published by Westland
Do you travel to the places that you write about for research?
A lot depends on whether or not I need to. The Krishna Key takes you to places like Dwaraka, Mathura and Vrindavan. I visited these places because despite having all the material, I needed to have a feel of the place. Sometimes, the places that I mention in the story do not exist today. For example, in Chanakya's Chant, I talk about ancient Pataliputra. There is no way I can go back and look at what it looks like. It is a suburb of modern day Patna. In such cases, the only option is to depend on the notes and documents available as archaeological pieces of evidence. I think right now too much importance is given to visiting places. Take for example Sialkot Saga that is placed in Sialkot; I never went there for research.
What is your favourite genre of books?
Frankly, my fictions are always inspired by the kind of books that I read. I read non-fiction mostly and that gives me ideas for my fictional writing, which is again a mix of fact and fiction. I love thrillers. That genre appeals to me because the page turns itself. Otherwise, I love reading books on history, mythology, science and spirituality. I love paranormal stuff too. I'd love to read more genres, but time doesn't let me explore much. Most of the books that I read are related to the research I do.
Have your books ever posed threats to you?
I have always said that my work is fiction. Controversies arise only if you write mythology and history as non-fiction. As long as you approach a subject with respect, there will be no controversy.
What do you do when not writing?
Ten years ago, I was a businessman who was a writer. Today I'm a writer who is a businessman. Most of my time is spent on research these days. The other time is spent with friends and family. Where is the time beyond that?
Has your marketing background ever hindered your creativity?
It has never been a hindrance. I've seen many good writers who don't get the appreciation they deserve. The prime reason is that they don't know how to market themselves. I think the author has the responsibility to ensure that the book reaches the widest possible audience. Just like filmmakers in Bollywood or Hollywood market their films, writers too, especially the ones in commercial genres need to market their books.
Speaking of mythological writing, the three names that usually come up are yours, Amish Tripathi's and Devdutt Pattanaik's. What makes your audience different?
There is bound to be an overlap between all the authors. Devdutt simplifies mythology. You can read it as a story. Amish on the hand retells the story. He gives you his take on it. As far as I'm concerned, I figure out if it's possible to write something linking history and mythology to a contemporary story. The mythological narrative is always a part of it. Let me tell you, I'm a huge fan of the works of both Amish and Devdutt. Immortals of Meluha was very fresh. Devdutt's retelling of Ramayana was very interesting, especially the illustrations.