New Delhi [India], April 1 (ANI): The government's decision to allow Special Economic Zones (SEZs) units to sell in the domestic market has triggered concern among local manufacturers, who fear cheaper SEZ goods could undercut them at home.
Finance Ministry sources, however, told ANI that the relief measure comes with a robust three-pillar safeguard framework -- designed specifically to ensure the domestic industry is not disadvantaged.
SEZ units already enjoy significant structural advantages -- duty-free inputs, certain tax benefits, and world-class infrastructure. When the government announced that these units could now sell up to 30 per cent of their export turnover in the domestic market, alarm bells rang in some quarters of the domestic industry.
The fear was straightforward: if SEZ goods enter the home market at lower costs, domestic manufacturers -- who operate under the full weight of duties and taxes -- could find themselves competing on an uneven playing field. Would this relief window, critics asked, effectively become a backdoor subsidy for SEZ units at the expense of domestic producers?
Finance Ministry sources told ANI that the measure has been designed around three interconnected safeguards that must be understood collectively, not in isolation.
The first pillar is an equalised concessional customs duty. Sources were careful to clarify that the duty applicable on SEZ-to-domestic market clearances is not a giveaway.
"The duty is calibrated to broadly neutralise the cost advantages that SEZ units already enjoy, so that goods entering the domestic market are not unfairly priced," sources told ANI. The linkage with Most Favoured Nation rates further ensures that the overall level of protection for the domestic industry is maintained.
The second pillar is the hard cap of 30 per cent of export turnover for domestic sales. This is perhaps the most important safeguard, sources said, because it structurally prevents SEZ units from pivoting away from exports toward the domestic market.
"SEZ units cannot shift their focus to the domestic market. Their main purpose remains exports, and domestic sales are only a limited support measure," sources explained. This ceiling, officials argued, rules out any large-scale diversion of output that could disturb domestic market equilibrium.
The third pillar is a minimum 20 per cent value addition requirement on inputs. This clause effectively shuts the door on misuse. SEZ units cannot simply import goods cheaply and sell them in India under the cover of this relief window.
Only units engaged in genuine, substantive manufacturing activity qualify -- ensuring the measure strengthens real production rather than enabling low-value trading that could undercut domestic manufacturers.
Beyond the three pillars, Finance Ministry sources pointed to another layer of protection -- sectoral exclusions. Certain industries, particularly those where domestic producers are vulnerable or where import tariffs are already low, have been deliberately kept outside the scope of the relief measure.
"The government is being selective and cautious, rather than opening the domestic market completely," sources told ANI. The exclusions reflect a conscious effort to shield industries where even limited SEZ competition could cause disproportionate harm.
Taken together, Finance Ministry sources argued, the architecture of the measure points firmly toward balance rather than favouritism.
"When all these elements are put together, it is clear that this relief measure is not intended to create an uneven playing field," sources told ANI.
"It is a balanced and controlled mechanism to give SEZ units some flexibility during a difficult period, while still protecting domestic manufacturers," they said.
The automated customs systems and faceless assessment processes that back the measure also add a layer of transparency and accountability, reducing the risk of misuse or circumvention that could harm domestic industry.
The relief window has been announced against a backdrop of significant global stress -- weakening export demand, geopolitical disruptions, and supply chain turbulence that have left many SEZ units running well below capacity. Finance Ministry sources underlined that the measure is strictly a one-time, time-bound intervention and carries no implied commitment toward permanence or expansion.
"The emphasis of Special Economic Zones is and will continue to remain on exports," sources told ANI. "This should be understood in the current geopolitical context, not as a structural overhaul of India's SEZ policy."

—

This report was published from a syndicated wire feed. Apart from the headline, the EdexLive Desk has not edited the copy.