Advanced Search
Please provide search keyword(s)- Search results for Supreme Court
Image | Title | |
---|---|---|
![]() | Additional police deployed in 'sensitive' areas in K'taka after hijab verdictThe state government has said that the ban on hijab in educational institutions will continue as the final decision on the matter is awaited from the Chief Justice of India | |
![]() | Hope in judiciary, says student who fought for right to wear hijabThe student was one of the petitioners who moved the High Court seeking to protect the right of Muslim girls to wear hijabs in educational institutions | |
![]() | #WhatTheFAQ: After split verdict in hijab row, will CJI refer the matter to a larger bench? What does this mean?A constitutional bench is formed in rare cases and Article 143 of the Indian Constitution briefs about the scenarios in which this bench can be formed | |
![]() | Withdraw hijab order, appeals All India Muslim Personal Law Board to the Karnataka governmentThe AIMPLA General Secretary Maulana Khalid Saifullah Rahmani said that Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia's view on the hijab case was in line with the requirements of the Indian Constitution | |
![]() | Hijab row: Supreme Court's final verdict will be important, says Karnataka CMA bench of justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia pronounced a split judgement on the Hijab issue | |
![]() | Denial of hijab is an attack on dignity, privacy and right to education of girl students: Justice DhuliaIn the split verdict on the matter, Justice Dhulia said that whether the hijab is an Essential Religious Practice is not relevant to the decision of allowing girl students to wear it in a classroom | |
![]() | Hijab case: From January 1 to today, October 13. How did the controversy unfold?SC delivers split verdict on hijab ban, directs placing appeals against Karnataka HC order before CJI for constitution of larger bench | |
![]() | #WhatTheFAQ: Supreme Court delivers split verdict in Karnataka hijab case. What does this mean?The incident started in December 2021 at a Government PU College in Udupi when a group of six female students claimed that they were not allowed to enter the classrooms wearing hijab | |
![]() | Hijab case: Ban on hijab to continue in Karnataka educational institutions, says Education Minister BC NageshA bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia delivered a split verdict on a batch of appeals against the Karnataka HC judgment | |
![]() | Breaking: Split verdict by Supreme Court in Karnataka hijab ban case; matter to be placed before CJIThe Supreme Court on September 22 concluded the hearing of the Hijab case and reserved the judgment after ten days of hearing | |
![]() | Right to undress, dropout students: Important arguments made during Supreme Court's hearing of hijab caseSeveral pleas have been filed in the top court against the March 15 verdict of the high court holding that wearing hijab is not a part of the essential religious practice | |
![]() | Hijab case: Supreme Court to deliver judgement today, October 13. This is what has happened so farThe counsel appearing for the state had argued that the Karnataka government order that kicked up a row over hijab was "religion neutral" | |
![]() | Hijab case: Supreme Court likely to announce judgement tomorrow, October 13Supreme Court concluded the hearing of the Hijab row on September 22 and reserved the judgment | |
![]() | While Ukraine-returned students attempt to go back, Indian Embassy in Kyiv issues advisory for Indian nationalsThe students and their parents have been demanding accommodation in Indian medical colleges for a long time now | |
![]() | Supreme Court upholds Calcutta HC's order on reappointment of Calcutta University VCThe Supreme Court held that the West Bengal government did not have the authority to do away with clauses requiring the approval of the Governor for the VC's reappointment |
Search results 105 - 120 of 496
If you have campus news, views, works of art, photos or just want to reach out to us, just drop us a line.