Former Chief Justice of India (CJI), UU Lalit on Thursday, February 9, urged that just like for medical students, mandatory internships should be introduced for law students as well so that they can work in rural areas with the rural population. The burning collegium controversy was briefly touched upon too, and when asked if there is a need to change the collegium, his answer was an emphatic no.
Speaking about Why Study Law: Social Duty and Legal Responsibility at the inaugural session of the 11th edition of ThinkEdu Conclave, the former CJI UU Lalit, said, “Study of law must not be confined to universities and colleges, but must be open to the masses and the societal apparatus. It is time that emphasis should be given to internships where students will have to work with rural populations, interact with them, understand their problems and the challenges faced by them,” said the former CJI.
Read Also ; Say goodbye to disparities in student scores: NCERTS joins hands with ETS to launch PARAKH to set norms for all school boards
UU Lalit said there should be one year of compulsory internships for those who pursue law. He added, "These examples will make them aware of the infirmities of that population and turn them into complete professionals and good human beings." The internship process will help make the rural population aware of their legal rights and make legal aid more accessible to them.
“In courses like medicine, where, after a person graduates, the student has to give it back to society by serving as an intern in rural areas, why not in the legal profession? Why is it that the service of rural areas is the prerogative only of medical professionals?" he asked, advocating for the need for the internship system.
Lalit said that he has been advocating the introduction of this internship system, in which, as a principle, law students are bound to give back to society. This will help young professionals gain first-hand experience with the rural population and the arrangement will be conducive to ensuring legal aid for the rural population.
Sharing his experience as the chairperson NALSA (National Legal Services Authority), Lalit said since almost 66% of our population is below the poverty line, almost two-thirds of the legal matters involving them should be in the hands of legal aid services. However, hardly 15% of this population is able to avail legal aid services. This reflects that either many are not aware of the legal aid apparatus available for them or they don’t have faith in it.
Poor people in rural areas still mortgage their properties and pay high-interest rates to fight their legal cases, he said and added, this problem needs to be solved and is against legal principles. “Regular interaction with a cross-section of the rural population will make law study for students more on the substance side rather than just getting a degree,” said Lalit.
Answering questions from the audience towards the end of the session, the UU Lalit shared his experiences as CJI and the reforms he brought in during his tenure. He opined that there is no need to change the Supreme Court collegiums system. He also spoke about the proposal he has mooted for the appointment of legal aid defence counsel in each district, on the lines of public prosecutors. The legal aid defence counsel system, headed by one chief counsel and assisted by two to three junior counsels, preferably one woman, will help in providing legal aid to the poor and needy.
